deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
Download File
HTML, 5.0 KB
more ▶

More from ~ParanormalAvenue

Featured in Groups:

Details

May 8, 2012
5.0 KB
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 11
Favourites: 9 [who?]

Views: 338 (0 today)
Downloads: 11 (0 today)
[x]
If you don't like Meg fine. But there is ONE argument that makes me want to slam my head against a desk until my face is a bloody pulp.

Essentially, the argument is made bits and pieces of:

"Meg's a villain, and she should stay that way"

"But Meg's a demon. Demons can never change."

"Look at all the horrible things she did in season one!"

"She killed Ellen and Jo!"

Okay. Okay. First of all, I'm pretty sure that at least half of the posters who make the Ellen and Jo statement didn't even CARE about them until recently. Not saying all of them, but I'll place my money on about half.

Secondly, guess what guys? MEG HAS CHANGED. No, I don't mean in the "Megstiel feels" sorta way. I'm not even commenting on the last episode.

I'm talking about every single appearance she has made since season 1. Meg is many things, but a stagnant character is not one of them. See she's gone through this little thing I call character development. You know, where a character changes and grows from where they were when we first met them?

Is Sam the same Sam from season one?

Is Dean the same Dean from season one?

No, and HECK NO. These characters aren't being "OOC" or whatever. They are continually changing. A good reason why I like this show is that the characters actually develop and change as time goes on. Think about it: would have season 5 worked with a season 2 Dean? No. The characters are evolving and going through what we go through (in a less apocalyptical manner) each day. We aren't the same person we were a couple years ago. As Meg said: we learn. We grow.

Meg is no exception to this rule. In fact she may very well be one of the most interesting characters in this show because she has shifted from black and white to shades of grey. This is not a bad thing. In fact, I'd say it a good thing.

Here's why: Meg is the demonic parallel of the boys, argumentatively, specifically Dean and Cas. Meg served her father in Season 1. So did Dean. Meg began to question her father in season 2. So did Dean. Season 5 rolls around, and she is serving her God. Here, we can link her to Castiel. UST aside, the dynamic of that scene was in the parallels…Meg is serving Lucifer, but begins to doubt. Reflecting Cas' serving of heaven, their devotion and doubt are very similar. Then comes season 6. I like to say that here Meg is in the same position as Cas is in that they are both rebelling against their ruler and fighting for control. Also, note that while she has maintained her wit and snarky attitude, she is far less full confident than she was all those seasons ago. She's fighting a losing battle. Just like Cas. Just like Sam and Dean.

Which brings me to season 7…honestly, the sheer difference in Meg's portrayal caught me off guard at first, but now I get it: Meg's tired. She'd weary. She wants it to be done. Compare and contrast to Sam an Dean, and their weariness as well. And then, with this last episode, I can confidently say she is mirroring Cas in a rather beautiful way: she has become less sarcastic and a lot more serious. He has become less serious and more distracted. She and Cas are both echoes of who they once were because they are so TIRED. They have fallen so much from where they once where…she used to be, essentially, the king's daughter. He used to be the leader of an angelic army. She used to serve her God by his side. He used to serve the Heavenly Host. They have both lost pretty much everything.

Meg's a survivor now, and has descended into morally grey territory. Actually, I'm wondering right now whether Castiel is the only chatacter who will go down the path of redemption. It would be interesting if this happened to Meg as well; she's evolved so much since her first appearance, so for her to regain her humanity would be both a good twist and an amazing character study. I would like to see it being attempted.

In conclusion, yes, Meg is different. This is not being out of character. This is developing as a person. So to say that she can't change because she's a demon/villain would be a rather superficial statement. Characters, or at least, the interesting ones, continually change as time goes on. To say Meg cannot change would be an invalid statement in of itself because she has done nothing BUT change since her first appearance.

And yes, Meg was a cold blooded killer who killed many people, including Ellen and Jo (RIP). But so has Castiel. And Sam. And Dean. And Gabriel. And pretty much the majority of all characters ever introduced. To single Meg out for that and use it as a reason for her not being able to change would be rather…stupid.

Reasoning that Meg cannot change because of her species or because of her villain status would be ignoring the seasons of change that she has already gone through.
:iconparanormalavenue:
Admittingly, this was written as a way to let out some of my frustrations with the lack of understanding of Meg's character. I do, however, want to write an essay on her character without getting into fangirl mode. Would any of you enjoy that?

Meg- Supernatural
Add a Comment:
 
love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 1 1 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconhetaliahero:
I think that the reason Meg was questioning Yellow Eyes wasn't because she was actually questioning him wholly, but more so his reasons for not letting her be straightforward and killing the Winchesters. One of Meg's strongest traits is that she is very straightforward. She's not a backstabber generally, and if she wants you dead she'll generally be honest about it. She behaves to serve her cause in the simplest and most effective way possible. So having to pretend to be human and be friends with Sam wasn't very comfortable for her. The only other time she really did anything like that was in S7 when she pretended she was going to cut those two demons a deal before she killed them, and that was a one time thing to keep from getting killed because killing them outright would be stupid (she had to find out how many of them there were).
Reply
:icondemoness19:
~Demoness19 Dec 15, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Yes, right here just yes. This is very good my friend, very good. :) Though in my oppinion it's also Dean's fault Ellen and Jo died. I mean he knew there were HellHounds there and yet being that stuborn genious he refused to talk, instead he had to act and look where that got him. Well anyway this is very, very good. I truly like it alot. I love that I'm not the only who can Meg has changed and all. Thank you very much for writing this. :)
Reply
:iconalcanis-ivennil:
This. I really want to believe in her. She seems so genuinely worried for Cas and definitely siding against her own kind. If I hadn't known Ruby, I'd trust her 100%, but I think by this point to have her turn out to be a traitor would be simply bad writing.
Also, she could have killed Cas easily while he was helpless if she wanted revenge for that holy fire incident. She has a sword after all.
Reply
:iconparanormalavenue:
EXACTLY.

She's pretty morally ambiguous at this point of the show, but I'd love to see them explore her character more next season. if you know, she ever comes back :/ I always thought it would be interesting to bring back yellow-eyes, to see their interactions now. See how different it would be, you know?

Kind of like how it would be different between Dean and John, and Cas and God.
Reply
:iconzolo-plushie-chick:
I have to agree completely here. Meg is amazing in all her ever-changing colours and I think people are a bit wary after Ruby doing what she did. Which I can understand but Meg isn't Ruby, Meg's been with the boys since the start, either fighting against them or helping them to further their goals in order to help herself. She IS still a demon, and she IS still using the boys to a degree to help herself, which is all she needs in order to BE herself, you know what I mean?

The mirror-ing I like, I never thought abut that before but yeah, I do have to agree on that one. :D It's an excellent point. Anyway, yes, I can't wait to read the final draft on this. :)
Reply
:iconparanormalavenue:
thanks for your thoughts!

And yes, I suppose people are weary of Ruby-ness, but that's where you need to understand how DIFFERENT these characters are:

Meg, in all of her villainous glory, is consistently honest.

Ruby, though likable, was a liar.

I'm not saying that the writers could "Rubify" Meg, I'm just saying it would be a very bad move.
Reply
:iconzolo-plushie-chick:
I know how different they are, they're very different. Totally agree on those points and to "Rubify" Meg, as you accurately put it, would indeed be a very bad move.
Reply
:icontheoutlawwitch:
*theoutlawwitch May 9, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
You have some very good points, and I would really enjoy reading the finished draft.
Reply
:iconparanormalavenue:
Thank you! I hope it will be good :)
Reply
:iconsweet-ninetails:
Finally! Hopefully people will read this. Though I have to say, Meg does mirror Sam in a lot of ways. Dean never questioned John like Sam did. Sure Meg always followed orders but she seemed to question Azazel, like when she first appeared, she was kind of pissed offed that she wasn't allowed to kill the Winchesters, and she wanted to know why. Also, when she possessed Sam. Yes, a lot of demon have escaped hell, but to me, Meg's seemed to be like Sam's runaway to Stanford. She risked even furthering Azazel's, along with many other demons', anger to do something she deemed necessary. In fact she ignored orders to keep the brothers alive, since she was trying to get Dean to kill Sam. Like how Sam ignored John's orders to stay.
You do bring up alot of Meg's character that I haven't really realized, which got me to thinking. I can't wait to read the final draft/
Reply
Add a Comment: